Our history lessons are never just a straight-forward account of the past. They are based on carefully constructed ideas which shape our sense of who we are and how we understand our place in the world. Across the UK and Ireland, the way history is taught varies significantly between nations. These differences are not just technical quirks of curriculum design – they reflect deeper questions about national identity, belonging, and the stories we choose to tell.
At PolicyWISE, we are preparing a new Wise in 5 briefing to compare how history is positioned in the curricula, focusing on the period of secondary education when it is compulsory – ages 11 to 14 in Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales, and England and ages 12 to 15 in the Republic of Ireland. This blog offers a glimpse of what’s to come.
Five Nations, Five Approaches
Each curriculum shapes how young people understand not only their own nation’s past but also the shared and contested histories of the UK and beyond.
Why This Matters Now
The timing of this comparison is significant. With England and Northern Ireland’s new curriculums on the horizon, and Ireland, Wales, and Scotland having recently implemented changes to theirs, the UK is at a crossroads in how it teaches its past. Across all five nations (to varying extents), there is also a growing awareness of the need for more diverse perspectives in history teaching – this means encouraging a more critical and inclusive approach to histories of topics such as empire, migration, and slavery.
As with other policy areas, divergence across the five nations can be both a strength and a challenge. It allows for innovation and responsiveness to local contexts, though this also needs to be negotiated within nations as well as across the UK.
History is never neutral. The choices policymakers make today will shape how tomorrow’s citizens understand themselves, their neighbours, and their place in the world.